Turning a press app’s empty Explore tab into a daily edition that broadens what subscribers read.

Client

Cafeyn

year

2026

role

Product Design - UX & UI - Product strategy

Project Description

Cafeyn gives subscribers unlimited access to 1,600+ newspapers and magazines. Its own data shows that readers who discover more titles stay longer. Yet most subscribers read the same two or three, and the Explore tab built to change that sits nearly empty.

The interesting part was that Cafeyn had already solved half the problem without noticing. Daily Digest, a dated and finite edition on Home, proves readers will open a short, curated selection every day. It was simply pointed at catching up on the news, never at broadening what people read.

In a six-hour design challenge, I reframed discovery from a place you visit into a ritual you keep. L’Édition is a finite daily edition that starts from your taste and deliberately leans a little beyond it, with a reason behind every pick. It reaches readers where they already are: a row on Home, the moment they finish an article, and a weekly recap that shows how far their reading has travelled.

Type

Concept · design challenge

Team

Solo

Timeline

6 hours · July 2026

Platform

iOS · Android

Tools

Figma · Cafeyn brand tokens · Claude

00 · Overview

Problem

Discovery drives retention, but Explore is a flat wall of identical article cards. Subscribers open it once and never come back.

What I did

Took the finite edition Cafeyn already ships and pointed it at discovery. Designed one engine with four touchpoints, the rationale line, and the metrics to prove or kill it.

Result

Presented to Cafeyn’s Product Director and design team, and it moved me forward in the process. Not shipped.

Concept · not shipped

Six-hour solo design challenge for Cafeyn, July 2026. Built on the public app and the brief’s own data. The persona and reading data are illustrative.

01 Context

02 Insights

03 Reframe

04 Explorations

05 Structure

06 Solution

07 Measuring success

08 Reflection

01 · Context

Cafeyn had already built the perfect discovery object. It was aimed at the wrong job.

For the business

Per the brief’s data, subscribers who read more titles stay longer. Every subscriber stuck on two titles is a churn risk, and a reason to wonder why they pay for 1,600.

Per the brief’s data, subscribers who read more titles stay longer. Every subscriber stuck on two titles is a churn risk, and a reason to wonder why they pay for 1,600.

For the owner

Subscribers come for a ritual, not a catalogue. They won’t go looking for something new, and when the app suggests something, nothing tells them why.

Subscribers come for a ritual, not a catalogue. They won’t go looking for something new, and when the app suggests something, nothing tells them why.

Constraints

6 hours, solo

Cafeyn’s brand system

Publishers’ own formats

A calm, older audience

No access to user data

02 · Insights

App audit

Dashboard audit

Brief data

End-of-service timeline

Jobs to be done

Market research

Competitor scan

Insight 01

Nothing makes you come back.

Explore shows only articles, never magazines. Identical cards, no personalisation. One scroll is enough.

Source · App audit

Insight 02

No reason, no trust.

Nothing tells readers why a title is there, so they scroll past. Unexplained suggestions train people to ignore suggestions.

Source · App audit · JTBD

Insight 03

The best moment is wasted.

Readers finish an article they loved and the app offers nothing. The highest-intent moment in the product is a dead end.

Source · App audit

Meanwhile, Daily Digest, a dated, finite, algorithm-driven edition, already lives on Home. It proves the format works. But its job is catching readers up, never broadening them.

“I know what I like to read. If you think I should read something else, tell me why.”

Jean Moreau · proto-persona, subscriber for 3 years, Lyon

Jean Moreau · 45, project director

Proto-persona

Subscribed for two titles; he knows there are 1,600 others and has opened five. 7:15am, coffee, twelve minutes before the kids come down. If something is going to reach him, it’s in that window.

The ritual

“Help me keep my morning ritual effortless.”

The next read

“When I finish something good, tell me what to read next.”

The reason

“If you suggest something new, tell me why.”

03 · The reframe

How might we make the Explore tab more engaging?

How might we make the Explore tab more engaging?

How might we bring discovery to Jean, inside the ritual he already has?

How might we bring discovery to Jean, inside the ritual he already has?

Principle 01

Every pick explains itself

If the system can’t say why it chose something, it doesn’t choose it. One recommendation, one reason, one line.

Principle 02

The comfort zone is sacred

His favourite titles never leave the top of Home. Discovery pays rent one row down.

Principle 03

Finite over infinite

An edition ends. That’s exactly why he comes back tomorrow. No streaks, no FOMO, no infinite scroll.

04 · Explorations

Four directions, judged on one question: does it work for Jean at 7:15am? Two survived, together.

REJECTED

Fix the destination

A better browse surface. A prettier grid doesn’t answer why Jean would ever go. The problem isn’t the shelf, it’s the trip to the store.

REJECTED

Go feed-first

An article-level vertical feed. It fights the brand’s calm, the audience’s age and the publishers’ formats. It optimises minutes, and minutes aren’t the prize.

KEPT

Dissolve into the flow

Discovery at the moments of real intent: end of read, Home, a weekly recap. Alone, it sparks appetite with no home for the habit.

KEPT

Make it a ritual

Point the proven edition format at discovery. Alone, nothing drives traffic to it, which is the current state. Together, they fix each other’s flaw.

Three bets I designed against, each cheap to test and safe to lose

It’s sameness, not reluctance

Test: a dated edition as a fake door against the current feed. If wrong, the concept dies in two weeks for the price of a prototype.

A reason changes everything

Test: the same card with and without the “Because you read…” line. If wrong, the system still works; it just persuades less.

End of read converts best

Test: taps to first read across the three placements. If wrong, cut the card, keep the edition, lose nothing.

05 · Structure

One engine. Four touchpoints.

States and edge cases

No reading history yet. The edition leans on declared interests and says so.

“That’s all for today.” A calm end, his titles one tap away, no padding.

The pick steps back and trains tomorrow’s edition. A refusal is input, not a dead end.

The weekly mirror shows 0 without guilt and offers three new doors instead.

06 · Solution

06.1

06.1

The entry point

Discovery earns a row on the screen he already opens.

1

His favourite titles keep the top slot. The ritual that pays the subscription is never demoted.

2

“Your edition of the day · 3 reads chosen for you” sits one row down. Discovery starts where Jean already is, not in a tab he has to remember.

3

Daily Digest stays exactly as it is. Catching up and broadening are different jobs.

06.2

06.2

L’Édition

Mostly his taste. Deliberately, a little beyond.

1

The date is the title. Fresh, finite, different tomorrow.

2

Descending confidence: his interests, then the morning’s moment, then openly “Far from your habits”. The 30% beyond his taste is named, not hidden.

3

Every pick carries its reason and a “Not for me” exit. The edition ends, and that ending is the reason to come back.

06.3

06.3

Read next

The highest-intent moment, no longer a dead end.

1

One card, never a feed. The best next read, already chosen, not ten options asking him to choose again.

2

The reason travels with the suggestion. Same voice as the edition, same trust.

3

Ignored or refused, it steps back and trains the engine. Restraint is what earns it the right to come back.

06.4

06.4

The weekly mirror

Breadth, shown as progress he can feel.

Three numbers, no report. “1 discovery” is the product’s north-star metric, shown to Jean as his own progress. Three doors into adjacent worlds turn looking back into next week’s first reads. One tap hands him back to the edition. The loop closes and reopens.

07 · Measuring success

Two numbers, one bet.

North-star

Breadth rate

Share of monthly readers who open a title for the first time. The engine’s one job, measured directly.

Guardrail

Favourite-title engagement

Weekly reading frequency of followed titles. Proof that discovery never cannibalised the habit that pays the subscription.

First test

Retention

Cafeyn’s data already links breadth to retention. I don’t need to claim it; I need to feed it.

THE TRADE-OFF

A finite edition hides most of the catalogue on any given day, and one card per moment means fewer impressions. Time spent in Explore may go down. If we measured minutes, this design fails on purpose. The prize is retention, so I traded volume for trust and conversion.

A finite edition hides most of the catalogue on any given day, and one card per moment means fewer impressions. Time spent in Explore may go down. If we measured minutes, this design fails on purpose. The prize is retention, so I traded volume for trust and conversion.

08 · Reflection

What I would do next

Talk to real readers, in both brands

Jean is a hypothesis. A Cafeyn reader isn’t a Readly reader; rhythms and loyalty differ. I’d validate before rolling out across 15 countries.

Design the edges

The prototype shows the ideal morning. The first edition with no history, the edition finished by 8am, the week with zero discoveries: that’s where trust is won or broken.

The bigger bet

Home is causing the problem

Home leads with “Your favourite titles”: publications, not stories. Every session replays the same two-title loop. The product teaches narrowness, then asks a dead tab to cure it.

Make Home story-first

Open with the day’s best reads filtered by interests, with favourite titles one row down as a fast lane. Shippable behind a holdout group, with the ritual always one tap away.

Credits

Solo design challenge for Cafeyn, July 2026

Persona and reading data are illustrative

Magazine covers belong to their publishers